Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Work-share uncertain for Japanese sub proposal

The Entrenched Defence Bureaucracy (note I did not state ASC), can't be trusted to build a canoe.

It appears Japan may think the same.

NEGOTIATIONS are continuing with Japan about acquiring the next-generation submarine fleet, the Defence Department says, following a reported offer from Tokyo to build the vessels with both Japanese and Australian labour.

The Mainichi Shimbun newspaper reports Japan officials have proposed to help build the submarines instead of exporting a new fleet, following concerns in Australia over the impact on the local shipbuilding industry.

Under the proposal, Japan’s defence ministry would co-operate with Australia in developing special steel and other materials for its new submarines, while Tokyo will be in charge of assembling them, the report said.

The Australian negotiators reportedly took “a positive stance” to the proposal, adding the two countries may strike a deal by the end of 2015.

Asked about the report, the Department of Defence said in a statement: “Work is progressing to explore options for a conventionally powered Future Submarine, and Australia is discussing issues relating to submarines with a number of countries, including Japan.

“No decisions have yet been made on the design and build of the next generation of Australian submarines.

“The government’s decisions will be based on reliable data evaluated against the Navy’s requirements.”

Bold emphasis added.

I read that as not assembled in Australia until the negotiations state otherwise.

The last sentence in that quote isn't supported by any historical standard. If the DMO and other usual suspects are involved, bank on the project being screwed up.

The Entrenched Defence Bureaucracy, is all about self-before-service.

As for getting Japan's support, it is odd that Carr and fans of Carr, don't have a problem with letting Japan swing in the wind if they get in a jam with the Chinese Communists.

---

-New Defence White Paper fails to address Australia's core security needs
-2009 Defence White Paper Fantasy
-Analysing "The ADF Air Combat Capability- On the Record"
-Find out who is responsible for the Air Warfare Destroyer mess
-Analysis of Defence Materiel Organisation Major Projects Management and What Needs to be Fixed
-New DMO Boss warns the staff that business as usual is over
-How dangerous is the Defence Material Organisation to our Defence Industry?
-Australia's Failing Defence Structure and Management Methodology
-More on the dud-jamming gear Defence wants to buy
-ADF cost per flying hour
-I will wipe out bullying vows new Defence chief (Houston 2005)
-Vacancy
-Put Vol 2 Report of DLA Piper Review into the light of day
-Rory and Jim
-Parasitism as an Abstraction for Organizational Dysfunctions
-Hobart-class "Air Warfare Destroyer" to be fielded with obsolete radar guidance technology
-The Decay Of Critical Military Thinking And Writing-With Particular Reference To The RAAF
-Newspaper guy gets it right about sub project.... big time
-The great M-1 tank myth
-*UPDATE* Fear and loathing in Canberra - Audit released on MRH-90 helicopter project 
-RAN bullies contractor over Collins sub replacement
-2014-15 ADF budget shocker - Star-ranks
-Air Warfare Destroyer -- Billions, not millions over budget
-Australia's M-1 tanks are... a downgrade compared to what it had
-Weak links put on rubber-stamp Defence panel
-Stop the nonsense (Collins-class submarine replacement)
-Insert Joke Here
-Tyranny of distance--Long, drawn out helicopter projects are unsustainable
-2014-15 ADF budget shocker - cost per flying hour over the last budget year
-Tiger savaged by Navy League of Australia
-Tiger helicopter update
-Overview of corruption in Australia
-Government ignores its own 'rescue' report created to fix Air Warfare Destroyer woes
-DM Johnston fired in cabinet reshuffle

No comments: