Friday, December 5, 2014

Tax-payer funded ASPI unwilling or unable to warn public about extreme-risk F-35

What you will see in this video is the brute force power of some of the top fighter designs. What you won't see is how this ability also translates into being able to make significant, pre-positioning 3-5g turns at high altitude and Mach.

This high performance gives you the ability to start a fight on your own terms. The higher performance aircraft always has that advantage.

It also allows you to change directions quickly to ruin an enemy no-escape-zone solution before or after they fire. Then, run down and kill inferior aircraft that have already expended their few rounds of long range missiles.

So where does the F-35 fit into all of this?

The F-35 will be slower; firing up-hill and be lacking in any useful air-to-air ability. Yet we have been told--for years--the reason to buy this garbage is to maintain regional air supremacy.

That will not happen.

And these people that suck down our tax-dollars have no clue on air power issues and the extreme risks of the F-35, Just So Failed.

This is either misleading the public based on willful ignorance, or, an agenda.


---

-Time's Battleland - 5 Part series on F-35 procurement - 2013 
-Summary of Air Power Australia F-35 points
-Bill Sweetman, Aviation Week and the F-35
-U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) F-35 reports
-F-35 JSF: Cold War Anachronism Without a Mission
-History of F-35 Production Cuts
-Looking at the three Japan contenders (maneuverability)
-How the Canadian DND misleads the public about the F-35
-Value of STOVL F-35B over-hyped
-Cuckoo in the nest--U.S. DOD DOT&E F-35 report is out
-6 Feb 2012 Letter from SASC to DOD boss Panetta questioning the decision to lift probation on the F-35B STOVL.
-USAFs F-35 procurement plan is not believable
-December 2011 Australia/Canada Brief
-F-35 Key Performance Perimeters (KPP) and Feb 2012 CRS report
-F-35 DOD Select Acquisition Report (SAR) FY2012
-Release of F-35 2012 test report card shows continued waste on a dud program
-Australian Defence answers serious F-35 project concerns with "so what?"
-Land of the Lost (production cut history update March 2013)
-Outgoing LM F-35 program boss admits to flawed weight assumptions (March 2013)
-A look at the F-35 program's astro-turfing
-F-35 and F-16 cost per flying hour
-Is this aircraft worth over $51B of USMC tac-air funding?
-Combat radius and altitude, A model
-F-35A, noise abatement and airfields and the USAF
-Deceptive marketing practice: F-35 blocks
-The concurrency fraud
-The dung beetle's "it's known" lie
-F-35's air-to-air ability limited
-F-35 Blocks--2006 and today
-The F-35B design is leaking fuel
-F-35 deliveries
-ADF's wacky F-35 assumptions
-Gauging performance, the 2008 F-35, Davis dream brief
-Aboriginal brought out as a prop
-Super Kendall's F-35 problem
-LM sales force in pre-Internet era
-History of F-35 engine problems
-Compare
-JSF hopes and dreams...early days of the Ponzi Scheme
-The Prognostics
-2002--Australia joins the F-35 program

No comments: