Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Action stations cheerleaders

It can’t be called “AOL Defense” because there has not been much credible defense reporting.

I shall name it; “AOL”.

Anyway, AOL is hyping the coming of the Singapore F-35 FMS order. Yet at this time there is no evidence of credible and working mission systems. Marketing spin is not a mission system.

This is a fun quote from the AOL piece:

"If you want to understand the calculus driving these choices, first look at China, which to countries such as Singapore, Japan, South Korea and Australia is the primary long-term threat."

Poor calculus.

And this:

One senior official from the region, who has access to the most sensitive classified information about the system, told me recently that the F-35 is "simply undefeatable."

The author links this fantasy from the Second Line of Defense F-35 fan club.

The two reference threats in the West to simulate emerging PacRim threats are the F-22 (playing the PAK-FA) and the Typhoon (playing the SU-3X). It is doubtful that the F-35 can defeat an F-22 or Typhoon.

Then there is the ground-to-air threat.

And about that FMS buy for Singapore: the aircraft has to show up delivered in working form. And, there are real off-sets. Something the original Joint Strike Fighter Partner Nations should feel cheated about because they signed up for the "best value" Ponzi scheme.

AOL leaves us with this huge confidence builder:

Add the regular port visits to Singapore by the Littoral Combat Ship fleet to the F-35 decision and you've got a pretty powerful national security statement by the tiny state.

Can you say AirSea Battle?


-------

-Summary of Air Power Australia F-35 points
-Aviation Week (ARES blog) F-35 posts (2007 to present)
-U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) F-35 reports
-F-35 JSF: Cold War Anachronism Without a Mission
-History of F-35 Production Cuts
-Looking at the three Japan contenders (maneuverability)
-How the Canadian DND misleads the public about the F-35
-Value of STOVL F-35B over-hyped
-Cuckoo in the nest--U.S. DOD DOT&E F-35 report is out
-6 Feb 2012 Letter from SASC to DOD boss Panetta questioning the decision to lift probation on the F-35B STOVL.
-USAFs F-35 procurement plan is not believable
-December 2011 Australia/Canada Brief
-F-35 Key Performance Perimeters (KPP) and Feb 2012 CRS report
-F-35 DOD Select Acquisition Report (SAR) FY2012
-Release of F-35 2012 test report card shows continued waste on a dud program
-Australian Defence answers serious F-35 project concerns with "so what?"
-Land of the Lost (production cut history update March 2013)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

No wonder. Principals from both SLD Info and the Lexington Institute are regular contributor. The LM outside contractor PR machine is infiltrating yet another blog.

Cocidius said...

Yep, take a look at all the other marketing driven LM snake oil on display. Can you say LCS??