Also, a note to the Williams Foundation, before awarding yourself as "independent" you may want to brush up on appearances.
The sponsor section shows this.
(click image to make larger)
"Independent". Sure.
It is interesting that the Williams Foundation has this membership list that looks like a retired officers club. This is to give the non-military person the appearance of knowledge of topic. Yet, while they may have x amount of hours serving in uniform, they don't seem to have 15,000 or more hours doing flight test engineering.
It is pretty hard to believe the "5th generation" label with fighters as it pertains to the F-35. Especially if the aircraft was originally designed with the belief that there would be plenty of F-22s around to clear the big threats. The F-35 will be lucky if it doesn't get killed off by advanced fighters like the SU-35--a non-stealth aircraft.
If not faith, the Williams Foundation's ideas are fantasy best suited for a 10 year old model airplane builder that has spent too much time with the glue, those in a retirement home or those thinking of the next Ponzi scheme to bilk the clueless politicians and taxpayers.
The Williams Foundation certainly is correct about military organisations failure to learn or misinterpret emerging tactics and methods, but probably not the way the letter intended given their want of fielding in effect, a "Brewster Buffalo II" to face growing Pacific Rim threats.
It is unfortunate that some didn't take the hint for real capability.
I wonder how the Williams Foundation membership feels about job loss, defence capability loss and most important; misleading statements? Normally, one should not have to question the motivation of such people, however the evidence shows maybe it is time.
6 comments:
interesting how they redefine 5th gen...
That a lot of the Williams Foundation were in uniform means little. That a lot of the Williams foundation are fighter pilots means the world.
I don't understand your assertion of why flight test engineering means anything in understanding air combat! All the flight test engineers I know don't understand the first thing of how to gun a SU-27s brains out!
which flight test engineer has 15k hours in their logbook?
Unless they were a fighter pilot in a previous life and were now a test pilot vice "test engineer", their logbook means nothing anyway.
The Wirraway was a far better looking aeroplane.
A lot of US "pilots" thought they had the best fighter in the world going into WWII with the P-40.
Many of those same pilots went on to DIE under the guns of Japanese Zero's.
The number of "professionals" in uniform that have been snowed by the JSF snake oil is directly proportional to the stupefying sums of money being spent on perpetrating the largest military aerospace Ponzi scheme in history.
For over a decade of development not a single cannon round or missile has been fired and not a bomb dropped! Yet we're all supposed to ignore the years sliding development schedules, billions in cost overruns, and the long list of technical blunders.
Meanwhile elsewhere in the world REAL military aerospace development marches forward to the ultimate demise of the F-35 and its supporters.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-aNAZmSL50qY/TnooUo1ZLsI/AAAAAAAAACU/nc4wAF2lj4s/s1600/MlL6w.jpg
Post a Comment