Our politicians have been told for years by supposed experts that network centric warfare (NCW) ability will make us good and them bad.
Along with that are other catch-phrases like “system of systems”. This was one of the fibs used to sell the idea of the F-35 Joint Strike Failure (JSF) Brewster Buffalo II to the clueless sheep.
Most of this over-sell of NCW to our elected officials infers that our network will work. Not mentioned is that the enemy will have a network of their own as seen from this Chinese communist marketing video.
The most experienced user of NCW, the U.S., knows NCW is not a cure-all. Network nodes (land, air and sea forces) can be geo-located and jammed.
It is possible that the next Defence White Paper will be unusable garbage just like the last one. We can change this by asking our elected officials to find new contributors.
6 comments:
I'll volunteer for the next White Paper and nominate you to ELP.
An tarnation - the Buffalo was far more effective than LockMart's 2022 PAK-FA fodder.
Don't you think these "Just So Failed" or "Joint Strike Failure" or "Brewster Buffalo II" comments are just a tad childish? It kind of undermines any otherwise logical comment on this blog.
I could use other ridiculous comments I suppose.Ones that are equally childish.
"Maneuverability is irrelevant"
"Game-changer"
"On-track"
"Go it alone"
"Affordable"
"Lethal"
"Sustainable"
"Supportable"
Who the hell accuses someone of childish comments but refuses to provide a name other than the default anonymous? Childish is ignoring the coming train wreck and refusing to question the logic behind this juggernaught.
I don't have any of the identity accounts given as options, which only leave 'Anonymous".
So what if I used another name anyway...how the hell am I supposed to know who you are from the name "Goldeel1"?
wow
Post a Comment