Friday, February 20, 2015

ASC not so bad off...plenty of work for years

ASC has plenty of work for years, which goes against some of the doom and gloom stated for some time now, reports The Australian.

GOVERNMENT shipbuilder ASC says it has “enough work” for 20 years, undermining claims that thousands of naval jobs are at risk if the next fleet of submarines is not built in Australia.

As the potential purchase of Japanese submarines continues to stoke a political furore about widespread job losses, ASC’s acting chief executive Stuart Whiley has told parliament ASC workers are better off than many.

He rejected suggestions from Labor senator Sam Dastyari that the uncertainty about the multi-billion-dollar submarine project was having a “human impact” on the shipyard’s workforce.

“We have certainty in ASC,” Mr Whiley said.

“We have enough work for … 10 years (at ASC North shipyard), and inside the company for at least 20 years to support ­Collins.

“In terms of certainty, we are probably better off than most ­companies in the country at the moment.”

That last bit: certainly "better off" with a taxpayer-funded Soviet defence management model. Nice work if you can get it. After Abbott won the election in 2013, a losing Liberal Party member was given a job in ASC...with no real qualifications. Again, nice work if you can get it.

Nepotism

Also toward the end of the article, some back and forth...

Mr Whiley was also asked about ASC’s reaction to former defence minister David Johnston’s remarks late last year that it could not be trusted “to build a canoe”.

“It was water off a duck’s back,” he said.

“We got on with our jobs.”

My response would be, "Johnston is no longer working in that capacity. Someone in your position may want to ask why that is."



---


-New Defence White Paper fails to address Australia's core security needs
-2009 Defence White Paper Fantasy
-Analysing "The ADF Air Combat Capability- On the Record"
-Find out who is responsible for the Air Warfare Destroyer mess
-Analysis of Defence Materiel Organisation Major Projects Management and What Needs to be Fixed
-New DMO Boss warns the staff that business as usual is over
-How dangerous is the Defence Material Organisation to our Defence Industry?
-Australia's Failing Defence Structure and Management Methodology
-More on the dud-jamming gear Defence wants to buy
-ADF cost per flying hour
-I will wipe out bullying vows new Defence chief (Houston 2005)
-Vacancy
-Put Vol 2 Report of DLA Piper Review into the light of day
-Rory and Jim
-Parasitism as an Abstraction for Organizational Dysfunctions
-Hobart-class "Air Warfare Destroyer" to be fielded with obsolete radar guidance technology
-The Decay Of Critical Military Thinking And Writing-With Particular Reference To The RAAF
-Newspaper guy gets it right about sub project.... big time
-The great M-1 tank myth
-*UPDATE* Fear and loathing in Canberra - Audit released on MRH-90 helicopter project 
-RAN bullies contractor over Collins sub replacement
-2014-15 ADF budget shocker - Star-ranks
-Air Warfare Destroyer -- Billions, not millions over budget
-Australia's M-1 tanks are... a downgrade compared to what it had
-Weak links put on rubber-stamp Defence panel
-Stop the nonsense (Collins-class submarine replacement)
-Insert Joke Here
-Tyranny of distance--Long, drawn out helicopter projects are unsustainable
-2014-15 ADF budget shocker - cost per flying hour over the last budget year
-Tiger savaged by Navy League of Australia
-Tiger helicopter update
-Overview of corruption in Australia
-Government ignores its own 'rescue' report created to fix Air Warfare Destroyer woes
-DM Johnston fired in cabinet reshuffle

No comments: