Would the USAF be better off buying F-35B STOVL aircraft?
The requirement could be based on going against no emerging threats.
That leaves home air defense in and out of shorter runways. Even KDCA as a contingency.
20 air defense locations around the U.S. would be: 20, squadrons with 18 aircraft each for 360. Multiply by 10 percent and round up for 400.
10 AEFs (deployment buckets): 10 squadrons, 18 aircraft each for 180. Multiply by 10 percent and round up for 200.
Hey, I am just trying to make the best of a really bad mistake. For the USAF short-take off and landing is fine. Vertical landing really isn't needed.
Here is the latest F-35 propaganda video by LM and friends.
$120B for the buy.
Times 3 for life sustainment costs.
$480B total.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment