Tuesday, July 15, 2014

New warship’s 14,000 defects





First Canberra-class delayed 7 months.


New warship’s 14,000 defects (subscription via The Australian)


THE AUSTRALIAN JULY 15, 2014 12:00AM

Cameron Stewart

CONSTRUCTION of the nation’s largest warship has been delayed by seven months as workers battle to fix more than 14,000 minor defects in a fresh setback for the troubled naval shipbuilding industry.

The problems afflicting the $1.5 billion amphibious assault ship HMAS Canberra — the ship Tony Abbott wants to turn into an aircraft carrier — come on top of the well-publicised ­delays in the $8bn Air Warfare Destroyer program.

They come at a time when the Abbott government appears to be paralysed with indecision about how to proceed with the country’s largest defence project, the $36bn construction of up to 12 submarines in ­Adelaide.

I don't know. Only 7 months? OK. Fixable stuff? OK. But let us point to the real problem here. DMO did not properly inspect this hull when it came from Spain. The quality control at that point was not done. DMO and the appropriate crew of chair-warmers should wear ALL the blame for that.

A side note on that mention of the AWDs. They started out as a $5b/$6b/$7b program. Currently at about $8.5B not $8B and...on the DMO's Project of Concern List for gross stupidity. Do the math on that depending on which number one believes. As for 12 subs, well, DM Johnston has already stated that can be 6. Occasionally, like a broken clock being right twice a day, Johnston delivers.... well...to that low expectation.

HMAS Canberra was originally due to be handed to the navy in February, but it won’t be handed over until at least mid-September, after more sea trials next month.

Yeah, yeah. OK. It is the wrong ship class. Let us see what the butcher's bill is when it is handed over to the RAN. And let us see how many years they, and the DMO can maintain both the ships before they becomes rusting hulks due to poor program management and supervision.

Another problem for the Canberra-class? Yes, well, the MRH-90 (also on the DMO Project of Concern List). Pure garbage and no auto-folding rotors. Let us see how many people that puts in the hospital trying to ready it for flight or secure it on the deck post-flight.

Seriously, I'd prefer doing blog posts about great entrenched Defence bureaucracy achievements, but DJ Marky-Mark, your shit isn't sorted.

---
-New Defence White Paper fails to address Australia's core security needs
-2009 Defence White Paper Fantasy
-Analysing "The ADF Air Combat Capability- On the Record"
-Find out who is responsible for the Air Warfare Destroyer mess
-Analysis of Defence Materiel Organisation Major Projects Management and What Needs to be Fixed
-New DMO Boss warns the staff that business as usual is over
-How dangerous is the Defence Material Organisation to our Defence Industry?
-Australia's Failing Defence Structure and Management Methodology
-More on the dud-jamming gear Defence wants to buy
-ADF cost per flying hour
-I will wipe out bullying vows new Defence chief (Houston 2005)
-Vacancy
-Put Vol 2 Report of DLA Piper Review into the light of day
-Rory and Jim
-Parasitism as an Abstraction for Organizational Dysfunctions
-Hobart-class "Air Warfare Destroyer" to be fielded with obsolete radar guidance technology
-The Decay Of Critical Military Thinking And Writing-With Particular Reference To The RAAF
-Newspaper guy gets it right about sub project.... big time
-The great M-1 tank myth
-*UPDATE* Fear and loathing in Canberra - Audit released on MRH-90 helicopter project 
-RAN bullies contractor over Collins sub replacement
-2014-15 ADF budget shocker - Star-ranks

No comments: