Monday, July 28, 2014

Home-built sub plan questions

If you have trouble building surface ships (and other much more simple defence projects) maybe, building subs at home, isn't for you.

A defence discussion paper that will help set the direction for military spending in the years ahead has questioned whether Australia’s next fleet of submarines should be built at home.

Raising provocative questions that will likely spark fresh debate about the Abbott government’s commitment to local manufacturing, the paper issued by the Defence Department asks Australians to consider whether the higher cost of building submarines at home is justified by the work it would create for the local shipbuilding industry.

“There is significant debate emerging about the future submarine and whether it should be built in Australia. This debate must consider the cost, risk and schedule as well as the benefits of the different options,” the paper stated.

And...

...because Australia would give up some control over what is regarded as a country’s single most important military hardware asset.

Gee, had no problem doing that with aerospace. How is this different?

Labor and unions are likely to seize on the discussion paper as further ammunition in their assault on the government over its commitment to shipbuilding.

Pot calling kettle given their shitty oversight of this rent-seekers / jobs-program haven.




---



-New Defence White Paper fails to address Australia's core security needs
-2009 Defence White Paper Fantasy
-Analysing "The ADF Air Combat Capability- On the Record"
-Find out who is responsible for the Air Warfare Destroyer mess
-Analysis of Defence Materiel Organisation Major Projects Management and What Needs to be Fixed
-New DMO Boss warns the staff that business as usual is over
-How dangerous is the Defence Material Organisation to our Defence Industry?
-Australia's Failing Defence Structure and Management Methodology
-More on the dud-jamming gear Defence wants to buy
-ADF cost per flying hour
-I will wipe out bullying vows new Defence chief (Houston 2005)
-Vacancy
-Put Vol 2 Report of DLA Piper Review into the light of day
-Rory and Jim
-Parasitism as an Abstraction for Organizational Dysfunctions
-Hobart-class "Air Warfare Destroyer" to be fielded with obsolete radar guidance technology
-The Decay Of Critical Military Thinking And Writing-With Particular Reference To The RAAF
-Newspaper guy gets it right about sub project.... big time
-The great M-1 tank myth
-*UPDATE* Fear and loathing in Canberra - Audit released on MRH-90 helicopter project 
-RAN bullies contractor over Collins sub replacement
-2014-15 ADF budget shocker - Star-ranks
-Air Warfare Destroyer -- Billions, not millions over budget

No comments: