Navy officials say the modifications “are intended to offset the increased stresses associated with JSF exhaust. The exhaust patterns and flight characteristics of the F-35 required the shielding, relocation and removal of vulnerable systems that could sustain damage during flight operations, such as antennas, life rafts, life rails, safety nets and JP-5 fuel stations.”
Additionally, the Navy says, “The unique heat signature of the F-35 has required reinforcement of the flight deck to alleviate stresses from the heat of the jet, as well as modifying the flight deck coating to reduce erosion caused by jet exhaust associated with increased thrust. Specific system modifications that are unique to F-35 will also require the installation of new voltage regulators and rectifiers. Expanded mission capabilities of the F-35 have also required enhanced munitions throughput and systems capabilities to facilitate increased ordnance delivery and aircraft associated support equipment.”
Some of the detailed modifications include relocating or shielding features such as the Phalanx close-in-weapon system and Rolling Airframe Missile and NATO Sea Sparrow missile launchers, and protecting fueling stations.
The WSC-8 satcoms antenna will also be moved, and the aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) system is being expanded.
Times change. Now they can tell us.
The changes confirm that Lockheed Martin and the Marine Corps issued erroneous statements in early 2010 regarding the environmental effects of the F-35B’s exhaust. At that time, a company spokesman said that “extensive tests” had shown that “the difference between F-35B main-engine exhaust temperature and that of the AV-8B is very small, and is not anticipated to require any significant CONOPS changes for F-35B.”
I wonder how they intend to change the $27M F-35B motor on-board ship without taking 30-50 hours?
The article also goes on to say that the usefulness of the USMC's first F-35B deployment has been brought into question. Limited weapons employment capability: no gun pod and the USMC has allegedly explored the idea of adding an external electro-optical targeting pod in order to get ROVER which is also not available for any F-35 up to and including Block 3.
The United States Marketing Corps cabal inside the USMC has a lot of explaining to do.
---
Is this aircraft worth over $51B of USMC tac-air funding?
3 comments:
An excellently defined final line, Eric; "US Marketing Corps cabal within the USMC ©". Such that it deserves copyrighting in my opinion! (above mark is for simulation only and does not reflect an actual copy). :)
Simply Brilliant.
Anyway, unfortunately, it's probably more true today than perhaps ever before in history of the Corps...arguably something worthy to evaluate and assess.
-From a strong proponent of the USMC role and function (and it's future potential) and with a relative currently serving in rotary aviation.
An additional note on that re: my opinion, I like to see the USMC used for what they are good at: littoral area combat troops. All the other stuff is fluff that does not contribute.
Glanced thru the article and didn't notice anything about maintenance on board a Marine Corps amphib. Makes me wonder if they are planning any heavy maintenance on board? Wonder how "simple" it will be to operate compared to Harrier? Austere field of operations? I don't think so....
Post a Comment