Consider this:
Mr Snelling said he believed the program was on track after he met representatives of maker Lockheed Martin.
"From what Lockheed Martin said to me in briefings, I would be very, very confident about the future of that program," Mr Snelling told The Advertiser.
Emphasis mine.
A low-information rent-seeker says things are on track.
But, they are not.
---
-Summary of Air Power Australia F-35 points
-Aviation Week (ARES blog) F-35 posts (2007 to present)
-U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) F-35 reports
-F-35 JSF: Cold War Anachronism Without a Mission
-History of F-35 Production Cuts
-Looking at the three Japan contenders (maneuverability)
-How the Canadian DND misleads the public about the F-35
-Value of STOVL F-35B over-hyped
-Cuckoo in the nest--U.S. DOD DOT&E F-35 report is out
-6 Feb 2012 Letter from SASC to DOD boss Panetta questioning the decision to lift probation on the F-35B STOVL.
-USAFs F-35 procurement plan is not believable
-December 2011 Australia/Canada Brief
-F-35 Key Performance Perimeters (KPP) and Feb 2012 CRS report
-F-35 DOD Select Acquisition Report (SAR) FY2012
-Release of F-35 2012 test report card shows continued waste on a dud program
-Australian Defence answers serious F-35 project concerns with "so what?"
1 comment:
Kind of reminds me of Canada's Julian "The Crusader" Fantino in 2011.
Latest F-35 posts from the Canadian Defence & Foreign Affairs Institute's "3Ds Blog".
Mark
Ottawa
Post a Comment