Further, these are the claims by those wanting to spend your money on a fifth-generation-failure:
Not good when the F-35 is close to $35,000, $40,000, $50,000 per flying hour and we still do not have a fully working and tested, go-to-war product.
Saturday, February 9, 2013
Canadian Ponzi-scheme fans
The problem with Pennie and Lee's shit-analysis are reports like this.
Further, these are the claims by those wanting to spend your money on a fifth-generation-failure:
Not good when the F-35 is close to $35,000, $40,000, $50,000 per flying hour and we still do not have a fully working and tested, go-to-war product.
Further, these are the claims by those wanting to spend your money on a fifth-generation-failure:
Not good when the F-35 is close to $35,000, $40,000, $50,000 per flying hour and we still do not have a fully working and tested, go-to-war product.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
..and people say the F-15 is expensive. At least the plane actually works and the op costs are real.
This article is the equivalent of toilet paper.
The bars are incorrect.
The red lines in this graphic show the correct size of the bars assuming the percentage values were correct data:
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/1215/f35briefingcorrected.jpg
Factually challenged briefings like this would lead to major trouble and mocking in B2B relations.
Post a Comment