Monday, February 18, 2013

Houston endorsed F-35 on a whim

Air Chief Marshal Angus Houston endorsed Australia going with the F-35 simply because the U.S. said it was the right aircraft for Australia. No critical analysis was done.

A former Defence official closely involved in the oversight of the replacement program agreed to talk to Four Corners on condition that his identity was protected.

He said the decision to join the JSF program was taken without the aircraft ever being fully tested – and that Air Chief Marshal Houston was seemingly swayed by the enthusiasm of his US counterpart.

"He told several people at the time that the Chief of the US Air Force had said this was the right aeroplane for Australia and so Angus thought that was the correct answer, that this was the right aircraft for us."

The former Defence official said it was "an interesting approach" and certainly "speeded up the decision-making process".

He said Australia would normally have gone through a competitive tendering process to work out "what the aeroplane could do, what its costs and its schedule was".

But this had not happened in the case of the JSF, he said.

"We were proposing that we buy something being developed for the US Air Force, if you like, on a whim."

In a statement to Four Corners, Angus Houston said: "The System Design and Development phase was non-binding and the Australian Government could opt out if it so wished."

He added: "I am still convinced that the JSF is the right air combat aircraft to meet Australia's future security needs."


6 comments:

Anonymous said...

I wonder if the same "reasoning" happened up here in Canada?

NGF said...

I don't know what happened in Canada back then, but Ottawa has just announced a new process that will "review and assess all available fighter aircraft". See the following announcement including a link to the Terms of Reference:

http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/stamgp-lamsmp/ter-tor-eng.html

The DMO should copy and paste.

Anonymous said...

How in the world could a decision of this magnitude be made on one man's whim, particularly if didn't even have the backing at the time of a Prime Minister who was "a little bit in love with him"?

Bushranger 71 said...

Eric; Angus said he relied on advice from the Director General of Aerospace Development and DSTO. Well, who the hell is the former and what are his credentials? Similarly, anybody who has a BSc seems to be able to call themself a 'scientist' these days so what are the credentials of those who staff and manage the DSTO? Maybe the APA guys can provide such info!

The other interesting aspect is all the Hansard stuff relating to the F-111 decision wherein the Chief Scientist advised scrapping the platform based on erroneous wing testing by DSTO. Methinks it timely to bring all that into the public arena.

Anonymous said...

I wonder why this "former Defence official" who has previously been happy to embarrass himself on camera on 4Corners has suddenly decided to go into stealth mode?

Unknown said...

Couldn't be half as bad as being unskilled and committing the Australian taxpayer to a faulty Defence program using no credible analysis.